+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 19
Thread: Womens Weekly - nude cover.
-
06-01-2012 11:50 AM #1
Womens Weekly - nude cover.
Has anyone seen cover of this months Womens Weekly?
With nude photograph of Deborah Hutton
I think its tacky and publicity seeking on the part of Deborah Hutton - and hypoctitical on part of magazine - even is she is not at all airbrushed (highly unlikely,IMO ) it doesnt sit well with an article on body image issues - if they wanted to preach that women should accept their body and celebrate its differences etc - then at least have the integrity to put a photo of an everyday woman with wrinkles, saggy bits etc - and show pride in someone not model beautiful being comfortable in their body - otherwise what's the point exactly
But Im not a great fan of Womens Weekly anyway and never buy it - so wont make any difference to me.
Just wondering what you think?
-
06-01-2012 11:59 AM #2
Re: Womens Weekly - nude cover.
I think her body looks great. Her face though has had some kind of airbrushing and doesn't look right. Cant see the point of posing naked though whether you 25 or 55..unless it is for money, which she obviously needs.lol
Everything has beauty, not everyone sees it.
-
06-01-2012 04:38 PM #3
Re: Womens Weekly - nude cover.
She's an attractive woman....still....airbrushed to the shithouse if you ask me. (
)
Kekka
Nobody on their death bed ever said "I wish I'd spent more time at the office".
Life's a pretty precious and wonderful thing. You can't sit down and let it lap around you....you have to plunge into it.
-
06-01-2012 05:33 PM #4
Re: Womens Weekly - nude cover.
She did an interview yesterday about the pic and was very honest about that was airbrushed and the reasons why and it was not that much really. I just think she is one of the lucky ones and she has never had kids and has looked after herself so good on her but I do agree it is not showing the average 50 yo woman....
Laugh as much as you breathe and love as long as you live !
-
06-01-2012 06:03 PM #5
Re: Womens Weekly - nude cover.
i have always thought what a classic beauty she was.....not sure about the cover though....
i saw her once IRL and she was just stunning.Sparkles
-
06-01-2012 06:29 PM #6
Re: Womens Weekly - nude cover.
She is gorgeous so I would have been happier to see her not airbrushed & as Frannie said "not he average 50 yr old"

-
06-01-2012 07:00 PM #7
Re: Womens Weekly - nude cover.
Well, why don't one of us volunteer to do the same pose on next month's cover?
MOC? (
)
Kekka
Nobody on their death bed ever said "I wish I'd spent more time at the office".
Life's a pretty precious and wonderful thing. You can't sit down and let it lap around you....you have to plunge into it.
-
06-01-2012 07:02 PM #8
-
06-01-2012 07:02 PM #9
Re: Womens Weekly - nude cover.
I suppose it is what it is....a nude photo, somewhat airbrushed, of a 50 year old stunning ex model, who has never had kids?????........I agree not your average 50 year old!
Well no 50 year olds that I know of anyway.
I take my white patchy skin and raise you a muffin top belly with even a pimple or two and be happy with what I have. Cheers to us real ladies!!!!!!
-
06-01-2012 07:06 PM #10
Re: Womens Weekly - nude cover.
Well, what about Cherie then?? Who publishes The Weekly (that's monthly...
)? I must send off an email.
Kekka
Nobody on their death bed ever said "I wish I'd spent more time at the office".
Life's a pretty precious and wonderful thing. You can't sit down and let it lap around you....you have to plunge into it.




Reply With Quote


yes Heather it has dragged on.... BUT i think she needs to be in her families care now.
Schapple Corby